Thoughts from the CTO of Weedmaps and mentor.

The Dawn of Observability 1.0

Written in


As we prepare to embrace the next era software systems, it’s essential to look back and understand the beginnings of observability in software systems. Observability laid the groundwork for modern monitoring and enabled us to maintain and manage complex systems effectively. We’ll delve into the roots of Observability, its core components, and how it has paved the way for the transition to the next generation of Observability.

A Brief History of Observability

The concept of observability has its origins in control theory, as it refers to the ability to determine a system’s internal state by examining its outputs. Observability was initially limited to basic health checks and status reports, which provided limited insights into system performance and behavior.

However, as the landscape became increasingly complex, the need for a more comprehensive approach to monitoring emerged. This led to the development of Observability, which focused on three main aspects of monitoring:

  1. Collection and aggregation of system data
  2. Visualization and analysis of the collected data
  3. Alerting and reporting based on predefined conditions

The Core Components of Observability

Observability primarily revolves around metrics, logs, and events, each serving a distinct purpose in the monitoring process:

  1. Metrics are numerical values representing the performance of a system or application. They provide a high-level view of system health and can be used to create alerts based on predefined thresholds. Examples include latency, error rate, and throughput.
  2. Logs are time-stamped records of events that occur within a system. They contain valuable information about the behavior of applications and can be used for troubleshooting and debugging purposes. Logs can be generated by application code, infrastructure components, or third-party services.
  3. Events are discrete occurrences within a system, such as a service deployment, a configuration change, or an incident. By correlating events with metrics and logs, teams can better understand the root cause of performance issues and track the impact of changes on system behavior.

The Limitations of Observability

While Observability significantly improved the way we monitored software systems, it came with its own set of limitations:

  1. Metrics, logs, and events were often collected and stored separately, making it difficult to correlate information and gain a holistic view of system performance.
  2. Analyzing the vast amounts of data generated by modern systems required significant manual effort, which was time-consuming and prone to human error.
  3. With the increasing volume of alerts generated by monitoring systems, teams often experienced alert fatigue, leading to decreased responsiveness and missed critical issues.

Setting the Stage for Observability 2.0

Despite its limitations, Observability 1.0 laid the foundation for modern monitoring practices. It highlighted the importance of comprehensive system data collection, visualization, and alerting. We’re building on this foundation and addressing the challenges that have arisen in the age of microservices, distributed systems, and cloud-native technologies.

Leave a Reply